Government 2.0 has a number of challenges in Australia and around the world - developing the appropriate public sector culture, getting the right policies and technologies in place and, often overlooked, ensuring that our laws allow for the innovative use of online channels.
The latter challenge is being faced right in the ability for Australians to enrol online to vote.
Due to the Federal election the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has been inundated with people wanting to enrol at the last minute. The matter of online enrolment has been raised by GetUp!'s enrolment website which states "Enrol to vote: It should be easy!". Get Up! initially attempted to provide a web-based enrolment system, however this was disallowed by the AEC.
This was also discussed in a Sydney Morning Herald article, Hitch in plan to get voters on a roll a sign of the times.
This is a clear example of how our laws have not kept pace with technology. Australia's 1918 Commonwealth Electoral Act's section 101 (1) states that people must "fill in and sign a claim". The AEC has interpreted this as meaning that a physical signature is required to enrol to vote in Australian elections.
This makes it necessary for Australians enrolling to vote 'online' to print and hand sign their forms, either hand-delivering or posting them to an Electoral Office.
In one concession to modern technology, it is possible to scan a signed form and email it to the AEC - however a photograph of the form (which is for all intents and purposes a scan) emailed to the AEC is not acceptable.
There are likely to be many other areas where our laws are not designed for a digital society - with other clear examples being our copyright and defamation laws which are struggling to cope in a world where digital copies are cheap and fast to make and private comments are publicly visible online.
Based on these legal issues, beyond the work to adjust public sector culture or simplify online engagement, one of the real tests of many governments' commitment to Gov 2.0 will be in how they adapt their laws to suit a changing society.
The legislative challenges of Gov 2.0 - such as enrolling to vote online
July 20, 2010 by Craig Thomler
1
- 628 reads
- Feed: eGov AU
- Original article
» The Governing People Blogger Board
Dean Halstead is the Visualization Architect for US Federal Microsoft and the co-author of the Microsoft's widely recognized "Open Government Plan." Read more »
John M. Kamensky is a Senior Fellow with the IBM Center for The Business of Government and an Associate Partner with IBM's Global business Services. Read more »
Steve Radick is a Lead Associate with Booz Allen Hamilton and serves on the Advisory Board for the SmartBrief on Social Media. Read more »
- Individuals
YOU
Andrew Allison
Andrew Krzmarzick
Anthony Zacharzewski
b3rn
Candi Harrison
Carl Haggerty
Craig Thomler
Dave Briggs
David Eaves
Elizabeth Ross-Harrison
Emma Mulqueeny
Greg Palmer
Gwynne Kostin
Ingrid Koehler
Jackson Pollock
Jared Elosta
John Gray
Justin Herman
Kit Plummer
Lauri Stevens
Liz Azyan
Marc Gunther
Melissa Tullio
Mike Kujawski
Noel Hatch
Oliver Bell
Paige Craig
Paul Canning
Richard Fahey
Sara Cope
Stephen Morse
Steve Radick
Susan Gardner
- Elected/Appointed Officials
Alex Makin
Civil Air Patrol - NatCap
Douglas Carswell
John Duncan
Leighton Andrews
Nancy Heltman
Group Blogs
CivSource
Connecting Bristol
IBM Ctr - Business of Government
Microsoft Public Sector
Social Government
Gov 2.0 Summit
When: Tue, 2010-09-07 08:00












ariherzog said:
Have you ever submitted a "free magazine subscription" form on the web? Signatures are typically required if mailing or faxing it in; so for the website and because of auditing purposes, these forms ask for either the color of your eyes or some other characteristic in lieu of a signature.
Maybe government can emulate enterprise in this way.
- reply
- 0 points
Tue, 2010-07-20 12:16 — Ari HerzogPost new comment