Early on, I was eager to see what government agencies were doing on social networking sites, and I “friended” or “fanned” (new verbs?) several. A couple – specifically EPA and USA.gov – have done a nice job with their Facebook presences. They get it that these are social networks – places where people are informal; and what they post and the words they use reflect that awareness. That is not true of some other agencies. In fact, some (and I won’t embarrass them here) just use Facebook to post their press releases. Not seeing too many “likes” on those announcements. Duh. Press releases are not friendly. And most people I know don’t like to be bombarded by propaganda in their social settings (harsh, but true).
Unfortunately, over time, even the friendly agency status updates started to annoy me. They seemed intrusive in a place where my friends and family and I are hanging out. So I gonged them.
It looks to me as though interest is (and I’m being charitable) modest at this point for government presence in social networking sites. EPA’s Facebook page has 2,200 fans, as does USA.gov. Department of Homeland Security’s Facebook page has 1,600 members. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has 163 “fans.” Considering that Facebook has some 75 million users in the U.S. alone, not sure that government is doing a resounding business in that realm.
Would I search out government agencies on Facebook or My Space to find government information? Hmm – I don’t think so. I’d go to USA.gov or the agency website. Or I’d just do a search on the web.
Do I still think government has a place in social media? You bet. Twitter (and other microblogs). Feeds (web, email, and mobile phone). Huge potential! In fact, a must. YouTube…at least for agencies with an education mission (Smithsonian, NASA, etc.). I’m not convinced yet that people go to YouTube to be informed. I do know they go because they’re curious. So that might be a reason to be there…if you have the right content. Again – forget that press stuff. Boring.
I follow my local government on Twitter, and I’m grateful for their helpful and responsible Tweets on weather alerts, traffic snarls, and community issues. I subscribe to both email and mobile phone feeds from my local/county governments’ “alerts” page. As long as they Tweet/feed useful, practical information that I want and need (and don’t over-do it!), I think this is a great way for government to use social media/web 2.0. If they start sending me press releases or bombarding me with Tweets every 10 minutes, I’ll gong them, too.
I think it’s fine to do some experimenting – see what sticks. But at some point, I think it’s best to put your investment where data shows a real payoff. I don’t think government has to be (or even should be) everywhere, to benefit from social media.
Are my opinions and actions an aberration or a trend? Time will tell. So what do you think?
Link to original post















WalterNeary said:
I posted on govloop about this, but one nitpick, and it's a nitpick, is that someone has to 'fan' my Lakewood WA City Council page in order to get updates on the page. People who are critical of things I do ought to be able to get update on the page without saying they are a 'fan' of me. But that's a quibble, although I could also see someone discouraged from subscribing to updates for that reason.
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2009-09-03 12:48 — Walter Nearysaid:
But how many fans are active contributors to that page? Does there come a point when one is a fan of dozens, hundreds, of FB pages and can not keep up? It's like LinkedIn groups; I frequently receive LinkedIn invitation requests to join the Department of State's LI group, or the GSA's LI group. I've tinkered with joining, and later, leaving. There's no value for me and I fail to see the value for them. Right now, anyway.
Don't get me wrong, though. I think there's a huge value-add for agencies to use FB and LI for recruitment and even communication purposes (like @lafd on Twitter); but for networking? I don't get it.
Great post.
- reply
- 0 points
Thu, 2009-08-06 10:39 — AnonymousPost new comment